Assessor Resource

MSFID6008
Evaluate design project outcomes

Assessment tool

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


This unit of competency covers evaluating design project outcomes, including all aspects of the project against the requirements of the project brief, to make comparative judgements against evaluation criteria.

No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.

You may want to include more information here about the target group and the purpose of the assessments (eg formative, summative, recognition)



Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Identify evaluation criteria

1.1

Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements

1.2

Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified

1.3

Communication requirements are identified for the project

1.4

Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified

1.5

Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified

1.6

Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified

1.7

Evaluation criteria are identified

2

Apply evaluation criteria

2.1

Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design

2.2

Finished design is evaluated against original design concept

2.3

The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency

2.4

The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied

2.5

The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences

2.6

The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements

2.7

The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements

2.8

Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes

3

Suggest design improvements

3.1

Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented

3.2

Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria

3.3

Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements

3.4

Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability

3.5

Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements

3.6

Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others

3.7

Evaluation report is compiled and produced

Follow work instructions, operating procedures and inspection processes to:

minimise the risk of injury to self or others

prevent damage to goods, equipment and products

maintain required production output and product quality

Evaluate three (3) design project outcomes, including one (1) residential and one (1) commercial design, against project brief and additional evaluation criteria effectively applying design elements and principles

Use mathematical ideas and techniques to correctly complete measurements, make calculations, estimate material requirements and cost work

Communicate ideas and information to enable confirmation of work requirements and specifications, presentation of design/colour concepts, the reporting of work outcomes and problems

Establish a personal work methodology

Visualise 2-D notions into 3-D space and form

Manipulate a range of relevant computer software programs

Display critical evaluation skills, creativity, innovation, research skills and independent thinking

Experiment in both the planning of projects and methods of execution

Present design ideas

Initiate new ideas and work techniques

Avoid backtracking, work flow interruptions or wastage

Work with others and in a team by recognising dependencies and using cooperative approaches to optimise work flow and productivity

State or territory WHS legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice relevant to the full range of processes for evaluating design project outcomes

Organisational and site standards, requirements, policies and procedures for evaluating design project outcomes

Australian Standards and the Building Code of Australia (BCA) applying to interior design

Elements and principles of design, including liveability and accessibility

Creativity and artistic relevance

Ergonomics, anthropometrics, proxemics and aesthetic values

Characteristics of materials, products and defects

Design themes and design development

Colours, furnishings and decorations

Product, material and finish types and descriptions

Evaluation and reflective practice techniques

Sketching and drawing techniques

Procedures for the recording, reporting and maintenance of workplace records and information

Appropriate mathematical procedures for estimation and measurement

Environmental protection requirements

Established communication channels and protocols

Relevant problem identification and resolution

Assessors must:

hold training and assessment competencies as determined by the National Skills Standards Council (NSSC) or its successors

have vocational competency in the furnishing industry at least to the level being assessed with broad industry knowledge and experience, usually combined with a relevant industry qualification

be familiar with the current skills and knowledge used and have relevant, current experience in the furnishing industry.

Assessment methods must confirm consistency of performance over time rather than a single assessment event and in a range of workplace relevant contexts.

Assessment must be by observation of relevant tasks with questioning on underpinning knowledge and, where applicable, multimedia evidence, supervisor’s reports, projects and work samples.

Assessment is to be conducted on single units of competency or in conjunction with other related units of competency. Foundation skills are integral to competent performance in the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessment must occur on the job or in a workplace simulated facility with relevant process, equipment, materials, work instructions and deadlines.

Access is required to materials, equipment and specifications relevant to evaluating design project outcomes.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assingnment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Identify evaluation criteria

1.1

Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements

1.2

Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified

1.3

Communication requirements are identified for the project

1.4

Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified

1.5

Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified

1.6

Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified

1.7

Evaluation criteria are identified

2

Apply evaluation criteria

2.1

Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design

2.2

Finished design is evaluated against original design concept

2.3

The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency

2.4

The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied

2.5

The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences

2.6

The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements

2.7

The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements

2.8

Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes

3

Suggest design improvements

3.1

Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented

3.2

Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria

3.3

Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements

3.4

Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability

3.5

Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements

3.6

Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others

3.7

Evaluation report is compiled and produced

Specifies different work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Range is restricted to essential operating conditions and any other variables essential to the work environment.

Unit context includes:

work health and safety (WHS) requirements, including legislation, building codes, material safety management systems, hazardous and dangerous goods codes, and local safe operating procedures or equivalent

work is carried out in accordance with legislative obligations, environmental legislation, relevant health regulations, manual handling procedures, Liveable and Accessible Housing Design guidelines, and organisation insurance requirements

Project brief includes:

client needs and objectives

client aims and objectives, and criteria for evaluation

milestones

organisational or personal profiles and aims

image requirements and function

target market

budget

timeline

consultation requirements

colour requirements

Evaluation criteria includes:

how the design:

achieves project brief

meets budget

meets timeline

meets client needs

meets workplace and industry standards

is suitable for end use and target market

is suitable for current interior design trends and expectations

complies with building standards

applies environmental standards

includes suitable access for people with disabilities and the elderly

Finished design includes:

themes and concepts

fixtures

fittings and interior design products

furniture

soft furnishings and accessories

colour and finishes

specifications

quantities

quality

Elements and principles of design, including liveability and accessibility, include:

balance

similarity

texture

contrast

size

ground, volume

composition

orientation

form

structure

2-D space

position

proportion

3-D space

repetition

scale

line

rhythm

pattern

point

symmetry

tone

plane

Technical design skills include:

sketching and drawing

computer-aided design (CAD) representations

visual documentation

specification

Follow work instructions, operating procedures and inspection processes to:

minimise the risk of injury to self or others

prevent damage to goods, equipment and products

maintain required production output and product quality

Evaluate three (3) design project outcomes, including one (1) residential and one (1) commercial design, against project brief and additional evaluation criteria effectively applying design elements and principles

Use mathematical ideas and techniques to correctly complete measurements, make calculations, estimate material requirements and cost work

Communicate ideas and information to enable confirmation of work requirements and specifications, presentation of design/colour concepts, the reporting of work outcomes and problems

Establish a personal work methodology

Visualise 2-D notions into 3-D space and form

Manipulate a range of relevant computer software programs

Display critical evaluation skills, creativity, innovation, research skills and independent thinking

Experiment in both the planning of projects and methods of execution

Present design ideas

Initiate new ideas and work techniques

Avoid backtracking, work flow interruptions or wastage

Work with others and in a team by recognising dependencies and using cooperative approaches to optimise work flow and productivity

State or territory WHS legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice relevant to the full range of processes for evaluating design project outcomes

Organisational and site standards, requirements, policies and procedures for evaluating design project outcomes

Australian Standards and the Building Code of Australia (BCA) applying to interior design

Elements and principles of design, including liveability and accessibility

Creativity and artistic relevance

Ergonomics, anthropometrics, proxemics and aesthetic values

Characteristics of materials, products and defects

Design themes and design development

Colours, furnishings and decorations

Product, material and finish types and descriptions

Evaluation and reflective practice techniques

Sketching and drawing techniques

Procedures for the recording, reporting and maintenance of workplace records and information

Appropriate mathematical procedures for estimation and measurement

Environmental protection requirements

Established communication channels and protocols

Relevant problem identification and resolution

Assessors must:

hold training and assessment competencies as determined by the National Skills Standards Council (NSSC) or its successors

have vocational competency in the furnishing industry at least to the level being assessed with broad industry knowledge and experience, usually combined with a relevant industry qualification

be familiar with the current skills and knowledge used and have relevant, current experience in the furnishing industry.

Assessment methods must confirm consistency of performance over time rather than a single assessment event and in a range of workplace relevant contexts.

Assessment must be by observation of relevant tasks with questioning on underpinning knowledge and, where applicable, multimedia evidence, supervisor’s reports, projects and work samples.

Assessment is to be conducted on single units of competency or in conjunction with other related units of competency. Foundation skills are integral to competent performance in the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessment must occur on the job or in a workplace simulated facility with relevant process, equipment, materials, work instructions and deadlines.

Access is required to materials, equipment and specifications relevant to evaluating design project outcomes.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements 
Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified 
Communication requirements are identified for the project 
Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified 
Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified 
Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified 
Evaluation criteria are identified 
Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design 
Finished design is evaluated against original design concept 
The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency 
The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied 
The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences 
The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements 
The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements 
Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes 
Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented 
Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria 
Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements 
Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability 
Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements 
Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others 
Evaluation report is compiled and produced 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MSFID6008 - Evaluate design project outcomes
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MSFID6008 - Evaluate design project outcomes

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: